Tag: Donald Trump

What happened? A Nation panel analyzes the election.

What happened? A Nation panel analyzes the election.

One of the early sessions on this The Nation cruise was called “Dissecting Democratic Malaise: WTF happened.” The panelists were Nation publisher Katrina vanden Heuvel, Jeet Heer, Christina Greer, Elie Mystal and John Nichols, moderated by Sam Seder.


These comments are transcribed from my notes and might seem a bit choppy, but brings out the progressive view of how the election was lost.


John Nichols was the first speaker, and described our situation as “whipsaw politics,” where we go back and forth from one dangerous extreme to the other: rather than holding power for any longer period. He blamed the media for not knowing how to cover politics, but instead reduces it to simplistic gossip. He also noted that the GOP does NOT have a mandate: they had a very narrow victory.


Elie Mystal began by explaining that all the issues we discuss are shared except the issue of whiteness. All of the minorities knew that Trump was wrong, but he was essentially elected by white people. On our cruise ship, he assumed that we could easily find people who voted for Trump, but that if you asked them why, they would give you a “socially acceptable answer,” but the real issue was white racism.
Seder noted that we will have to devote significant efforts to reaching these white people.


Christina Greer said that we are watching a kleptocracy forming itself in real time. And while you might expect that poor white women (who voted for Trump) they didn’t, because they had never “experienced the boot.” Instead, voters latched onto some essentially irrelevant issue like transgender teenagers (who are a very small number of people) as an excuse to swing their vote to Trump.


Jeet Heer noted that it was amazing that we elected a con man and criminal toe the presidency. Trump’s appeal seemed to be “I will protect you,” which is unlikely to be true unless you were some of the super-rich. He also noted that Kamala ran as part of the establishment rather than as a refreshing change.
Katrina vanden Heuvel noted that Kamala spending three days with Liz Cheney was 3 days wasted when she could have been reaching the voters she needed. There is a significant need to reorganize the Democratic party, because they are heading to being the party of Rahm Emmanuel.


In general discussion that followed, the point was raised that Harris was never able to take her own position on Gaza, which probably hurt her with younger voters. She was more or less captive to Biden’s unpopular policies.


The DNC (Democratic National Committee) came under significant attack. Speakers felt that it “served no useful purpose,” and gave Harris no useful help. It didn’t have any strategy to reach the working class. Harris didn’t exploit her multi-racial, multi-ethnic characteristics in her campaign, and this, they blamed on the DNC. Their strategy was too cautious.


Christina Greer felt that had there been a primary, Kamala would not have been the nominee. Democrats chase speakers where there are problems, showing that “I can build coalitions with horrendous people.”
California needs to revise how they count votes. Democrats need to maximize their turnout. Only 63% of eligible voters voted this year, and a lot of Democrats stayed home. In California this was a significant problem for Democrats.


The media did not do an adequate job of covering the election: they are more interested in who has the power. As far as encouraging young voters, young people don’t see themselves in politics.


Great politicians may arrive in non-traditional ways. Seder sees possible candidates among Ro Kahana, Chris Murphy, and AOC, and those already active include Gavin Newsom and Christie Whitmer. Sometimes a transformational figure arrives from outside traditional politics: one such candidate might be LeBron James. And don’t count out Jamie Raskin. What we do have to do is move from party-centered politics to candidate-centered politics. And resist Clintons and Obamas getting involved!

In an afternoon session, Joan Walsh joined a discussion with Christina Greer and John Nichols.
Walsh said that Kamala’ reputation was being torpedoed quietly by Biden staffers, and said should cold cite names. Biden was more popular among black women. She said that Kamal’s campaign was inititially a sh*t-show when she took over. She tried to introduce a working class agenda for women, not men.
Kamala did better than Biden among seniors. Lower middle class women should have gotten a lot of help from the Kamala campaign, but “Nancy said no.”


The media doesn’t know how to report on black issues.


John Nichols finished off this session. He noted that her campaign defined her in terms of Trump rather than in terms of her own plans and ambitions. While commentators were saying that they didn’t really know Harris, it was Kamala who moved Biden closer to unions and arranged all of his union appearances. The fact that she was in charge of that labor movement was never communicated.


Her campaign as too much about Trump and Liz Cheney contributed nothing useful. The DNC is not a useful organization: it is solely concerned with raising money, rather than promoting candidates and policies.


Nichols said that he had a chance to interview Kamala early in the campaign, and one on one she was very impressive. She could easily have been a good President and might have been a great President.

The Nation magazine is a 160-year old publication, originally organized to combat slavery, but moved into other progressive causes after the passage of the 15th Amendment.

Donald Trump: I’ve had it with you!

Donald Trump: I’ve had it with you!

Enough! I’ve had it with Trump’s destructive non-governing!

Trump defunded Planned Parenthood. Trump hates women.
Trump canceled insured contraception for 55 million women. Trump doesn’t know some will die.
Trump said white supremacists are “good people.” Trump is a racist.
Trump’s cabinet is so corrupt it is a kakistocracy. Trump can’t pronounce it.
Trump wants to deport 800,000 young  DACA dreamers. Trump is cruel.
Trump’s Congress didn’t renew CHIP taking 9 million children’s health care away. Trump hates children.
Trump thoroughly bungled aid to Puerto Rico. He doesn’t think they are Americans.
Trump will take health care from 1 million poor people. Trump is a cruel racist.
Trump wants to increase our nuclear armament. Trump is an effing moron.
Trump undercuts Tillerson on North Korea. Trump wants a nuclear war.
Trump has gutted the State Department. Trump is abysmally ignorant.
Trump wants to undo NAFTA. Trump doesn’t get economics.
Trump thinks the stock market cancels out the national debt. Trump doesn’t understand money.
Trump withdrew from the Paris climate accords. Trump doesn’t understand science.
Trump threatened to cut funds to Puerto Rico. Trump is a monster.
Trump screams at his staff and berates senators on Twitter. Trump is cracking up.
Trump doesn’t know what the 25th Amendment says. We do.
  1. Trump privately signs anti-Planned Parenthood Law.
  2. Trump rolls back contraception mandate.
  3. Trump defends white nationalists
  4. American Kakistocracy
  5. Trump moves to end DACA and calls on Congress to act
  6. Congress misses deadline to extend Childhood Health Insurance
  7. Trump and his team do “heckuva job” in Puerto Rico
  8. 6 Ways trump slashing Obamacare could affect you
  9. Trump wanted tenfold increase in nuclear arms
  10. Trump undercuts Tillerson on North Korea
  11. US Diplomats say Trump budget would gut State Department
  12. Trump might actually wreck NAFTA
  13. Trumps nonsensical comments reveal he has no idea how national debt works
  14. US staying out of climate accord
  15. Trump threatens to abandon Puerto Rico recovery effort
  16. Losing it: Trumps public crack-up
  17. Told about 25th Amendment, Trump asks “what’s that?”
For Trump: Science is hard

For Trump: Science is hard

According to the Onion, a National Science Foundation Symposium concluded that Science is Hard. It really isn’t any harder than governing or public speaking or performing arts. Each has their own vocabulary and courses of study. But somehow, the general public thinks it is hard.

This has been borne out for years by our Congress, where only two members have degrees in any sort of science.  So it is not surprising that the Congress makes poorly informed decisions or assertions, like Senator Imhofe, who brandished a snowball in winter to assert that global warming is not real. Even worse, he cited biblical references to support his view, a book in which many people find comfort, but which was written by bronze age goatherds and unlikely to cover climate change.

So it is not surprising that incoming President Trump has dubbed climate change a “Chinese hoax.” To the contrary, Beijing is actively participating in policies to reduce carbon emissions, as are most countries.

You cannot expect a President to be an expert in all fields of endeavor, but you can expect him to appoint advisors who are experts in these fields, and it is here that the 28 appointments Mr Trump has made (out of about 660 that require Congressional approval) fail to support or understand science.  As we noted earlier, science is not a branch of politics, where many views may seem to be correct. Science is the result of rigorous experimentation, study and peer-review, and far less debatable than politics is. Or, to quote NGT, “Science is true, whether or not you believe  in it.”

In this context, it is deeply disappointing that Scott Pruitt, the nominee to head the EPA told Congress that “the extent of [human] impact [on climate change] is subject to continuing debate.”  In fact, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change concluded in 2013 that more than half of the climate warming from 1951 to 2010 was due to human activity. And it was just reported that 2016 was the hottest year on record for the third consecutive year.  This is no longer subject to debate, and government administrators cannot put off vigorous action if we expect our children and grandchildren to survive.

Likewise, Secretary of State nominee Rex Tillerson has expressed reservations on climate change and does not view it as an imminent national security threat.

The most horrifying recent hearing was for billionaire Betsy DeVos for Secretary of Education. DeVos has been a forceful advocate for charter schools, even though studies have shown that they are not particularly effective, especially in Michigan where DeVos has spent millions promoting them. From a science point of view, it is equally disturbing that Ms DeVos believes that the Earth is only 6000 years old. Her hearings have also shown that she knows nothing about education, either.

Sonny Perdue, the former Georgia governor, has just been nominated as Secretary of Agriculture. He once led a prayer ceremony in front of the Capitol, asking God to be forgive Georgians for being wasteful with water. According to the barely credible Environmental Working Group, as a former fertilizer salesman, Perdue seems less than likely to understand the water pollution problems uncontrolled fertilizer runoff can cause. The Agriculture Department has been involved in cutting greenhouse gas emissions, and while we do not know Perdue’s positions, his  boss has expressed significant skepticism on this issue. Perhaps more comforting is that as governor, Perdue established a seed capital fund, focused on the life sciences industry, and allocated $30 to$40 million towards strengthening biotech research at the state’s universities.

And, of course, Rick Perry, who is slated to take over the Energy Department, is famous for wanting to close it, once he remembered it’s name. Joking aside, though, in Congressional hearings, he was completely unwilling to admit that climate change poses a global crisis.

Every incoming President provides a mixture of hope and skepticism to the public, and our skepticism on his approach to science is substantial.